This is an old drawing that I made back in freshman year (in intro geology class, I believe). I think my squid drawing abilities are far better than my platypus drawing abilities.
The squid-with-big-gaping-hole-in-mantle is something that I notice everywhere, but when I re-discovered my old cartoon I decided to see how prevalent it actually is. So I ran a quick search for "squid" on Google Images, filtered by "clipart" to see. I excluded photographs and things that were clearly unrelated (e.g. things with the word 'squid' but no actual squid, squid-style multiplugs, people dressed as squids, etc) and put things that were labeled 'squid' but clearly not (e.g. octopuses, jellyfish, cthulhu) under the "Not a squid" category. This survey covers ~20 pages of Google Image results.
I like graphs and I like turning numbers into graphs. My life has plenty of numbers in it, so I graph them.
Sunday, February 27, 2011
Saturday, February 26, 2011
Air consumption
These were early attempts to calculate and compare my underwater air consumption rates from Fall 2009 to Summer 2010. I compared them by general region (New England, Moorea, Friday Harbor) and by water temperature (Cold: ≤18ºC, Warm: ≥27ºC). Outliers are circled and I traced them back to the actual logged dives, where they were generally associated with strong current or 'buddy issues'.
Of course, after I did this I found that people generally standardise air consumption for depth to give a 'surface air consumption (SAC) rate.' So I recalculated and replotted and here's my final air consumption graphed by region, complete with quartiles. You can see that it's a distribution with a long upper tail.
My dive log is a ridiculously tempting source of things to graph because I log all my dive information anyway. I'm sure some of the fancypants dive computers and software can do some of this for you, but I bet they don't have fun doing it and they they can't give you r-squares and regression coefficients!! (Not that those can tell you that much for dive data anyway)
Of course, after I did this I found that people generally standardise air consumption for depth to give a 'surface air consumption (SAC) rate.' So I recalculated and replotted and here's my final air consumption graphed by region, complete with quartiles. You can see that it's a distribution with a long upper tail.
My dive log is a ridiculously tempting source of things to graph because I log all my dive information anyway. I'm sure some of the fancypants dive computers and software can do some of this for you, but I bet they don't have fun doing it and they they can't give you r-squares and regression coefficients!! (Not that those can tell you that much for dive data anyway)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)